When EastEnders is Mysterious and Confusing
By Nancy Teel
EastEnders is a proven winner as
entertainment because of its
groundbreaking filming style and
wholesome, unkempt characters.
The zippy, 30-second scenes,
the accuracy of several plot lines
converging in perfect sequence and
the realistic subject matter are all
reasons why this British drama
continues to impress and amaze.
If one watches the drama for
decades, however, some mysterious
and confusing details begin to
emerge. Let’s start off with the
subject of boredom.
How can the citizens of Walford
not be bored to tears with their
jobs? Mark, Alfie, Kat and Zoe
stand in dirty streets in freezing
winters or muggy summers peddling
the same gear day after day.
Most adults would be bored out of
their minds. Perhaps that is why
market employees turn to despair
or entertain themselves by antagonizing
their competition and customers.
Another point is the youth of
Walford. Wouldn’t any teen
brought up in the Square be motivated
to attempt “college” since it
is free and the job opportunities in
the East End are dismal?
For example, Sharon, Ian and
Martin have lived their youth in
Walford and have known since
they were in nappies that running a
mundane business with a limited
clientele is their only option. A few
young adults in the series have
opened businesses but success was
fleeting.
As business owners, many of
the characters possess attention
deficit disorder – closing up shop if
an opportunity for a holiday arises,
a tragedy occurs, or a tea break is
required. It seems that the motors
at the Arches would be piled to the
sky considering how flaky Garry is
and how fast Phil goes through mechanics.
When Jamie works at the
Arches, he is either on the receiving
end of a fist, being fired, or
lying for Garry.
Escapism is one of the favourite
goals of these East Enders, and
how could we blame them? But for
normal people, departure from
home takes some planning and
time. Getting proper coverage for a
job, finding minders for pets and
plants, packing, and paying bills in
advance are all tedious and timeconsuming
chores for real people.
But not for the citizens of Walford,
like Lisa, Mark, or Zoe, who, in a
single afternoon, say farewell to
friends and foes and walk away
from responsibility with a small
suitcase and one bag for the child.
Finances are also intriguing. The
jobs do not pay well, but there
seems to be ample cash for airline
tickets when needed. Most workers
need to save for months to afford a
holiday or an escape, but East Enders
seem to be flush with cash
when need be.
Visitors to Britain know how
expensive it is to travel in a cab or
sip drinks in the pub, but the citizens
of Walford rarely worry about
how many drinks they buy in a day
or the price of cab fare when
needed.
Also, prior to the job at the stall,
Kat Slater did not seem to have any
income, but she still strutted
around the square in flashy finery
and gobs of make-up. Who paid for
that? Was she on the dole? Perhaps
she was borrowing make-up from
her sisters, but the clothes were not
her style or fit, if Kat borrowed.
Another confusing observation
is the floor plans of the council
houses. Viewers have had 25 years
to contemplate the living spaces,
but some areas are still vague. Just
how many bedrooms are in the
Slater house? Who shares with
whom? Is there one bathroom for
six people? Do Charlie and Big Mo
share a room, so that Kat has hers,
and Garry and Lynne have theirs?
Did Zoe and Kat share? Is there an
extra room behind the living room?
In Pauline’s house, there are
two extra rooms on the ground
floor, one that housed Ethel in her
final days and one that was decorated
for a nursery when Pauline
expected Sonia’s Chloe to live with
them. But since those plot lines
were concluded, the rooms are
never used and goodness knows
that the Fowlers could use the
space. The nursery
wall could
have been
knocked down,
and then Pauline’s
dining/living
room would have
been huge.
What about
Pauline’s upstairs?
Obviously
she and Martin
have their own
rooms, but is
there a third room up there? On
Michelle’s wedding day, 20 years
before, we saw her room, and
Pauline has woken Martin in his
own room a few times, but we
have never seen Pauline’s bedroom.
What could it look like? She
never even comes downstairs in a
nightgown! Morning, noon and
night, she is dressed in her longsleeved
shirt and pants.
In the 1990s, the then-married
Bianca and Ricky lived in a spacious,
two-bedroom flat, which
they entered, via stairs, to the right
of the Queen Vic. After that marriage
ended, Lorraine and Joe,
from Bolton, occupied the flat, but
who lives there now? It was a nice
spot and would have suited for Ian
and Laura, unless they could only
afford the one bedroom above the
chippie.
Finally, another discrepancy is
human energy. Doesn’t anyone
ever need a nap? Peggy rested,
fully dressed, after her breast cancer
reconstruction, and Little Mo
napped while medicated following
Trevor’s torture, but it seems like
the Walford crowd, no matter their
age, can work all
day, change into
their posh clothes,
then party at the pub
or the E20 until
closing time.
On occasion the
characters would say
that they would have
a “night in”, but that
phrase has not been
heard for a very long
time.
Perhaps this article
is critical of a
drama created to entertain
and sometimes
shock, and
what good would it
be if it focused on
naps, college life, or
floor plans? There
are times, however,
when the audience is thrown by a
character’s exit, how people cope
with small spaces, or how East Enders
afford their escapades.
As in real life and in a winning
soap opera, not every aspect will
make sense, but perhaps the creators
of EastEnders enjoy puzzling
us and will never reveal how many
bathrooms are in the Slater house
or what has become of Pauline’s
ground-floor rooms!
As Albert Einstein once said,
“The fairest thing we can experience
is the mysterious.”

Back to Latest Articles